Artificial intelligence will not become conscious. And insisting on that idea says more about us than it does about machines.

In 1980, John Searle proposed one of the most influential thought experiments in the philosophy of mind: the “Chinese Room.”

Imagine a person locked inside a room who does not understand Chinese.
Outside, someone slips under the door a sheet of paper with questions written in Chinese. Inside the room, there is a manual with highly detailed rules that the person can use to process those questions.

The rules are simple:

Whenever a set of symbols comes in, the person must respond with another specific set of symbols found in the manual.

By following these instructions, the person is able to produce perfect responses in Chinese.

To someone outside the room, there is no doubt:
The person inside understands Chinese.

But the reality is different. Inside the room, there is no understanding at all.
The person is simply following rules and manipulating symbols—just like any computational system, with or without generative capabilities.

The conclusion is clear:

A system can appear intelligent without understanding anything.

It can write, respond, and even persuade, without having any awareness of what it is doing or what is happening. It only “knows” that something came in, was transformed, and went out.

We may be impressed and even satisfied with the result, but we must not confuse fluency with consciousness.

If this is not consciousness, then what is?

If we want to talk about consciousness, we must leave the domain of computation and enter the domain of experience.

António Damásio showed that the mind emerges from the regulation of the body, from an organism that feels and reacts to its own state. But this idea does not begin in neuroscience. Philosophers of phenomenology such as Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Edmund Husserl had already identified a crucial point: the mind does not exist separately from the body. It is the body.

Mental states arise from physical processes, and perception is situated, embodied, lived. In short, the body is not a support for the mind, it is the condition of experience.

In living beings, consciousness is not processing, it is involvement. Through pain and pleasure, it becomes the central mechanism that allows us to evaluate the world, adjust behavior: flee or hunt? and create continuity between states.

And machines?

AI systems can simulate language, decision-making, and even emotion.
But they do not have a body in the phenomenological sense.
They do not have a situated perspective in the world, an inner experience, or a state that needs to be preserved.

More importantly: they have nothing at stake.

Without vulnerability, there is no urgency.
Without urgency, there is no meaning.
Without meaning, there is no consciousness.

And every time we see a machine doing something that appears human (crying, laughing) from 1980s toys to futuristic robots in South Korea or Boston Dynamics machines, they are doing what they have always done best: simulating better and better.

The fantasy persists

Much is said about the idea of singularity. The inevitable historical moment when artificial intelligence becomes conscious and renders humans obsolete. But this is an extrapolation, not a conclusion. It confuses increased capability with the emergence of experience.

And those are very different things.

Artificial intelligence may simulate everything we recognize as signs of consciousness. But it cannot have consciousness like ours. Because ours does not arise from computation, it arises from the body, from experience, and from the need to continue existing. It is the result of millions of years of evolution.

In the end, the difference is structural:

Machines process the world.
Living beings live it.

And as long as consciousness depends on a feeling body, a situated perspective, and something truly at stake, artificial intelligence may approach us, but it will never cross that boundary.

You may also be interested in:

European AI tools: Alternatives and the future of the EU’s digital landscape
Your digital project can really move forward!